中超VAR添乱,鲁能、苏宁欲哭无泪,为什么就没有伸冤的地方呢?
《中超VAR异象,鲁能与苏宁欲哭无泪——为何并没有伸冤之地》
The FIFA World Cup's use of Video Assistant Referees (VAR) has significantly improved the accuracy and consistency of game decisions, from an initial 95% rate to a remarkable 99.32%. However, key moments in various matches have sparked controversy, with calls for an investigation into questionable referee decisions that raised eyebrows worldwide.
After Russia's international soccer championship came to an end, the Chinese Super League (CFL) rekindled its competitive spirit, with VAR technology taking center stage once again. Among these high-profile games were鲁能-Sunshine Bay, a thrilling encounter between the league leaders, where the third-minute goal by Perreira for the Red Stars was裁定无效 but then disallowed due to an illegal tackle on Oscar by Australia's main referee, which ultimately resulted in fans raising questions about the validity of the scoring.

On Saturday night, the pivotal match between Shihejing Suqian and Beijing Guoan, which ended in a stalemate at half-time, also saw the utilization of VAR technology resulting in controversy. Substitute Tiago Delannoy dribbled past defenders to score a late equalizer, with the replaying video assistant officer (VAR) giving its prompt to the referee, Ye Haohong, who maintained his impartiality despite objections from the Yellow Card zone officials. The Russian World Cup champion stubbornly refused to award Sunflower Bay a penalty, forcing the host clubs to face disappointment and frustration.
Both the Red Stars and Suqian managed to endure injustice during their encounters, showcasing how seemingly innocent maneuvers could lead to substantial consequences when powered by modern-day technology like VAR. While clubs can file appeals within China's football governing body, the impact of such reviews is often negligible, making it almost fruitless to seek justice.
